Retrospective Evidence
Cross-source consensus on Retrospective Evidence from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The article cautions that causality cannot be established from the retrospective studies. — Prospective randomised controlled trial of the use of nasogastric tubes in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): protocol for the NASBO study
- Retrospective evidence cannot establish whether worse outcomes are caused by NGT use or by selection bias. — Prospective randomised controlled trial of the use of nasogastric tubes in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): protocol for the NASBO study
- Retrospective studies have questioned routine NGT use in ASBO. — Prospective randomised controlled trial of the use of nasogastric tubes in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): protocol for the NASBO study
- Local John Hunter Hospital retrospective data associated NGT use with higher operative intervention and longer hospital stay. — Prospective randomised controlled trial of the use of nasogastric tubes in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): protocol for the NASBO study