Review Evidence Base
Cross-source consensus on Review Evidence Base from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Six studies remained in the final synthesis after one initially eligible study was excluded for low methodological quality. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
- The final synthesis included 148 patients aged 13 years or older with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
- Searches were run in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from inception to 11 April 2025. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
- The review followed PRISMA and ENTREQ reporting guidance and was registered in PROSPERO. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
- The review assessed confidence in synthesised findings using GRADE-CERQual. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis