Risk-Based Exclusion
Cross-source consensus on Risk-Based Exclusion from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Just over half of the included studies excluded participants at screening or baseline because of suicide or self-harm risk. — How the risk of suicide and non-suicidal self-injury is assessed, monitored and managed in randomised controlled trials of interventions for youth depression: a scoping review
- Active suicidal ideation with intent or plan was the most common exclusion criterion. — How the risk of suicide and non-suicidal self-injury is assessed, monitored and managed in randomised controlled trials of interventions for youth depression: a scoping review
- Risk-based exclusion often lacked reporting on how many participants were excluded. — How the risk of suicide and non-suicidal self-injury is assessed, monitored and managed in randomised controlled trials of interventions for youth depression: a scoping review
- Many studies that excluded participants for risk did not record the criterion or method used. — How the risk of suicide and non-suicidal self-injury is assessed, monitored and managed in randomised controlled trials of interventions for youth depression: a scoping review
- High exclusion rates can reduce sample representativeness, especially when passive suicidal ideation is used as grounds for exclusion. — How the risk of suicide and non-suicidal self-injury is assessed, monitored and managed in randomised controlled trials of interventions for youth depression: a scoping review