Risk of Bias
Cross-source consensus on Risk of Bias from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- No included study had a low overall risk of bias. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- The conclusions are constrained because most included studies were single-arm or quasi-experimental and only one RCT was included. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Confounding and missing data were the most common sources of bias. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Generalizability is limited because most studies were conducted in USA academic medical centres. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Funnel plot analysis suggested no substantial publication bias, although it could not be excluded. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis