Risk of Bias and Evidence Synthesis
Cross-source consensus on Risk of Bias and Evidence Synthesis from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Randomised controlled trials will use Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2.0, non-randomised studies will use ROBINS-I, and other designs will use Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. — Effectiveness of community-based public health strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance in community settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review
- Methodological quality will be assessed independently by two reviewers using tools matched to study design. — Effectiveness of community-based public health strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance in community settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review
- Meta-analysis will only be performed when studies are sufficiently homogeneous in design, intervention, and outcome measures. — Effectiveness of community-based public health strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance in community settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review
- The certainty of evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the GRADE framework. — Effectiveness of community-based public health strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance in community settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review
- The review will use narrative synthesis and may use quantitative synthesis when appropriate. — Effectiveness of community-based public health strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance in community settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review
- Substantial heterogeneity will be defined as an I² value above 50%, leading to use of a random-effects model. — Effectiveness of community-based public health strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance in community settings in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review