Risks and Bias
Cross-source consensus on Risks and Bias from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Risks & contraindications
Highlighted claims
- Generative AI documentation systems raise concerns about documentation quality, safety, privacy, and bias. — Use of ambient AI scribe in physicians’ clinical documentation: a protocol for a systematic review on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction
- Generative AI tools can produce unsafe medical advice, inaccurate information, and hallucinations. — Use of ambient AI scribe in physicians’ clinical documentation: a protocol for a systematic review on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction
- AI outputs may amplify training-data biases such as ageism, racism, and gender discrimination. — Use of ambient AI scribe in physicians’ clinical documentation: a protocol for a systematic review on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction
- Passive AI scribes may introduce bias during transcription, summarisation, or prioritisation. — Use of ambient AI scribe in physicians’ clinical documentation: a protocol for a systematic review on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction