Scenario Analyses
Cross-source consensus on Scenario Analyses from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Scenario analyses tested uncertainty beyond probabilistic sensitivity analysis, including costs, mortality assumptions, and intervention effectiveness. — Equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker breast cancer educational programme in rural South Africa: a modelling study
- A higher-cost scenario reduced net monetary benefit and removed cost-effectiveness at the lowest willingness-to-pay threshold. — Equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker breast cancer educational programme in rural South Africa: a modelling study
- A higher-effectiveness scenario produced the largest health, economic, and equity benefits. — Equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker breast cancer educational programme in rural South Africa: a modelling study
- Using higher mortality rates lowered net monetary benefit but preserved cost-effectiveness under WHO thresholds. — Equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker breast cancer educational programme in rural South Africa: a modelling study
- A conservative intervention-effect scenario was cost-effective only at the highest threshold and left substantial inequities. — Equity impact and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker breast cancer educational programme in rural South Africa: a modelling study