Scientific Anomalies
Cross-source consensus on Scientific Anomalies from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
How it works
Benefits
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Science should investigate reliable anomalies instead of dismissing them solely because they conflict with current assumptions. — Losing the Nobel Prize and the Edges of Scientific Knowledge
- The article argues that beliefs about reality are provisional and may have corner cases. — Losing the Nobel Prize and the Edges of Scientific Knowledge
- For unusual observations, science should test whether they are false, explain their appearance, or make their mechanism teachable. — Losing the Nobel Prize and the Edges of Scientific Knowledge
- Most claims that Einstein was wrong are described as not useful, but openness is still valuable because unexpected contributions can come from outside normal channels. — Losing the Nobel Prize and the Edges of Scientific Knowledge
- Cross-disciplinary openness can produce valuable results, as illustrated by Keating's engagement with poet Rae Armantrout. — Losing the Nobel Prize and the Edges of Scientific Knowledge