Screening Outcomes
Cross-source consensus on Screening Outcomes from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Single-arm studies showed a pooled LDCT uptake rate of 98%, but the article interprets this as likely affected by selection bias and intensive research support. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Among screened individuals, 81% had benign or low-risk Lung-RADS findings. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Across eight studies, about 2% of screened individuals were diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Willingness-to-participate results should be interpreted cautiously because heterogeneity was extreme. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Comparative evidence indicated nurse-led SDM was non-inferior to standard approaches for LDCT uptake. — Effects of nurse-led shared decision-making on low-dose CT uptake and screening outcomes in high-risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis