Sedation and Analgesia

Cross-source consensus on Sedation and Analgesia from 1 sources and 5 claims.

1 sources · 5 claims

Risks & contraindications

On audit day, 41.4% of included patients were sedated. — LIFE-UP Day audit to monitor implementation of post-intensive care syndrome prevention practices: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Belgian intensive care units
Pain assessment was documented for 95.4% of patients. — LIFE-UP Day audit to monitor implementation of post-intensive care syndrome prevention practices: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Belgian intensive care units
Only 22.2% of sedated patients had a documented medical indication for sedation. — LIFE-UP Day audit to monitor implementation of post-intensive care syndrome prevention practices: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Belgian intensive care units
Non-pharmacological pain management methods were available in only one of eight ICUs. — LIFE-UP Day audit to monitor implementation of post-intensive care syndrome prevention practices: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Belgian intensive care units
Sedation and analgesia management was the most consistently implemented LIFE-UP domain, but gaps remained. — LIFE-UP Day audit to monitor implementation of post-intensive care syndrome prevention practices: a multicentre cross-sectional study in Belgian intensive care units