Self-Report Self-Care Instruments
Cross-source consensus on Self-Report Self-Care Instruments from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- The review included 30 studies covering 26 instruments. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- The review included studies on development or validation of self-report instruments for adult cancer patients. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- The instruments differed substantially by target population, specificity, and original validation language. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- Most included instruments were multidimensional, while medication adherence was the most common behaviour among unidimensional tools. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- Most instruments were developed for solid tumour patients, and only three addressed haematologic cancers. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines