Sex and Gender Reporting

Cross-source consensus on Sex and Gender Reporting from 1 sources and 5 claims.

1 sources · 5 claims

Uses

The secondary analysis assessed whether randomized trials of patient decision aids reported sex and gender accurately. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
Sex was treated as a biological attribute, while gender was treated as a social construct involving identities, roles, relations, and norms. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
Most randomized trials reported sex and/or gender, but only a small minority used the terms accurately. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
No included trials reported non-binary participant characteristics. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
Accurate sex and gender terminology did not improve in newer publications. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis