Socioeconomic Status
Cross-source consensus on Socioeconomic Status from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Other
Highlighted claims
- Wound prevalence was highest in the second most disadvantaged quintile and lowest in the least disadvantaged quintile. — Prevalence of wounds and patient characteristics in an Australian community setting: a retrospective cohort study
- More than 65% of wound care clients lived in areas within the two most socioeconomically disadvantaged quintiles. — Prevalence of wounds and patient characteristics in an Australian community setting: a retrospective cohort study
- The socioeconomic gradient was present for both acute and chronic wounds. — Prevalence of wounds and patient characteristics in an Australian community setting: a retrospective cohort study
- A clear social gradient in wound prevalence was observed. — Prevalence of wounds and patient characteristics in an Australian community setting: a retrospective cohort study
- The highest prevalence in the second most disadvantaged quintile may reflect lower healthcare access or greater self-treatment among the most deprived population. — Prevalence of wounds and patient characteristics in an Australian community setting: a retrospective cohort study