Stakeholder Feedback
Cross-source consensus on Stakeholder Feedback from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Preparation
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The workshops generated 99 discrete feedback items. — Development of the PREDICT-Kidney online tool to promote informed decision-making about kidney cancer follow-up care: a qualitative co-design study
- Ninety-two feedback items led to proposed changes and 71 changes were implemented. — Development of the PREDICT-Kidney online tool to promote informed decision-making about kidney cancer follow-up care: a qualitative co-design study
- Input-section feedback showed that necrosis and lymph node status were especially difficult concepts for patients and public contributors. — Development of the PREDICT-Kidney online tool to promote informed decision-making about kidney cancer follow-up care: a qualitative co-design study
- Introductory-page feedback called for clearer definitions of clinical terms such as recurrence and metastasis. — Development of the PREDICT-Kidney online tool to promote informed decision-making about kidney cancer follow-up care: a qualitative co-design study
- Printed-report feedback emphasized black-and-white legibility and accessible resources for paper copies. — Development of the PREDICT-Kidney online tool to promote informed decision-making about kidney cancer follow-up care: a qualitative co-design study