Standard Clean-Catch Urine
Cross-source consensus on Standard Clean-Catch Urine from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
How it works
Preparation
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- In the standard clean-catch group, staff wait for natural urination after cleaning while holding a sterile container. — Stimulation methods for collecting urine from hospitalised precontinent infants: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, open-label, three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial
- Standard clean-catch urine relies on spontaneous urination after perineal cleaning. — Stimulation methods for collecting urine from hospitalised precontinent infants: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, open-label, three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial
- Clean-catch urine has lower reported contamination rates than urine bags but may be slow and have low first-attempt success. — Stimulation methods for collecting urine from hospitalised precontinent infants: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, open-label, three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial
- The expected 5-minute success rate for standard clean-catch urine in the sample-size calculation was 10%. — Stimulation methods for collecting urine from hospitalised precontinent infants: study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, open-label, three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial