Structural Barriers to HIV Prevention

Risks & contraindications

Interactions

Comparisons

Where it comes from

Highlighted claims

• The Florida site had challenges identifying and randomizing participants. — Positive psychological intervention to reduce HIV acquisition risk with men who use stimulants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
• The protocol identifies legal and policy differences as structural determinants. — Positive psychological intervention to reduce HIV acquisition risk with men who use stimulants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
• California was an early adopter of PrEP, while equitable PrEP uptake remains a major concern in the Southern United States. — Positive psychological intervention to reduce HIV acquisition risk with men who use stimulants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
• Florida staff often emphasized privacy, confidentiality, and participant autonomy around social and legal risks. — Positive psychological intervention to reduce HIV acquisition risk with men who use stimulants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
• Florida has not adopted Medicaid expansion, which the protocol links to PrEP coverage and access to substance use treatment. — Positive psychological intervention to reduce HIV acquisition risk with men who use stimulants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
• The protocol presents limited public health infrastructure, criminal penalties for substance possession, and structural stigma as possible explanations for Florida recruitment challenges. — Positive psychological intervention to reduce HIV acquisition risk with men who use stimulants: protocol for a randomised controlled trial