Study Findings
Cross-source consensus on Study Findings from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Other
Highlighted claims
- Modified indices produced substantially higher continuity scores than unmodified UPC and BB indices. — Modifying continuity of care indices for adults with organ failure nearing the end of life: a retrospective population-based study in Ontario, Canada
- Median UPC-Team score was 0.79 compared with a median traditional UPC score of 0.44. — Modifying continuity of care indices for adults with organ failure nearing the end of life: a retrospective population-based study in Ontario, Canada
- Median BB-Team score was 0.75 compared with a median traditional BB score of 0.24. — Modifying continuity of care indices for adults with organ failure nearing the end of life: a retrospective population-based study in Ontario, Canada
- Traditional UPC and BB indices were almost perfectly correlated, while UPC-Team and BB-Team were also strongly positively correlated. — Modifying continuity of care indices for adults with organ failure nearing the end of life: a retrospective population-based study in Ontario, Canada
- Modified indices were less correlated with utilisation indicators, suggesting they were less confounded by outpatient care amount and complexity. — Modifying continuity of care indices for adults with organ failure nearing the end of life: a retrospective population-based study in Ontario, Canada