Study Limitations and Future Directions

Uses

Risks & contraindications

Comparisons

Evidence quality

Highlighted claims

• Patient non-completion created selection bias because those who completed the session may have been more motivated, resourced, or available. — Evaluation of an education intervention to support genomics research participation: a community-based pre–post study among participants under-represented in diabetes genomics research
• Cultural tailoring strengthened the intervention for the target community but limited direct transfer to other populations without adaptation. — Evaluation of an education intervention to support genomics research participation: a community-based pre–post study among participants under-represented in diabetes genomics research
• The study proposes using the pre/post survey structure to iteratively revise education content based on persistent gaps. — Evaluation of an education intervention to support genomics research participation: a community-based pre–post study among participants under-represented in diabetes genomics research
• Recommended next steps include larger cohorts, survey validation in different communities, and online or smartphone delivery to reduce participation barriers. — Evaluation of an education intervention to support genomics research participation: a community-based pre–post study among participants under-represented in diabetes genomics research
• The final sample was underpowered for adjustment of sociodemographic confounders. — Evaluation of an education intervention to support genomics research participation: a community-based pre–post study among participants under-represented in diabetes genomics research
• The community-engaged research development process was rigorous but time-intensive and costly. — Evaluation of an education intervention to support genomics research participation: a community-based pre–post study among participants under-represented in diabetes genomics research