Study Limitations and Selection Bias
Cross-source consensus on Study Limitations and Selection Bias from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- Non-responders and responders who did not enter the study tended to be older, more often male, and more comorbid than the final study population. — Prevalence and types of anxiety disorders among patients with cardiac conditions and elevated HADS-A scores: findings from the initial screening phase of the Heart and Mind trial in Denmark
- Generalisability is limited because only Danish-speaking patients were eligible. — Prevalence and types of anxiety disorders among patients with cardiac conditions and elevated HADS-A scores: findings from the initial screening phase of the Heart and Mind trial in Denmark
- Excluding patients whose HADS-D exceeded HADS-A may have introduced selection bias. — Prevalence and types of anxiety disorders among patients with cardiac conditions and elevated HADS-A scores: findings from the initial screening phase of the Heart and Mind trial in Denmark
- Under-representation of older, male, and more comorbid patients may have underestimated SCID-confirmed anxiety and limited generalisability. — Prevalence and types of anxiety disorders among patients with cardiac conditions and elevated HADS-A scores: findings from the initial screening phase of the Heart and Mind trial in Denmark
- Patients with greater illness severity may have been less likely to participate. — Prevalence and types of anxiety disorders among patients with cardiac conditions and elevated HADS-A scores: findings from the initial screening phase of the Heart and Mind trial in Denmark