SUPERDURA Trial
Cross-source consensus on SUPERDURA Trial from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- The non-inferiority margin is a 7% increased absolute risk. — Active subperiosteal versus passive subdural 24-hour drainage following single burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (the SUPERDURA trial): protocol for a multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial
- The SUPERDURA trial is a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial comparing active subperiosteal drainage with passive subdural drainage after single burr hole evacuation of symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma. — Active subperiosteal versus passive subdural 24-hour drainage following single burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (the SUPERDURA trial): protocol for a multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial
- Participants are randomized 1:1 before drain placement to passive subdural drainage or active subperiosteal drainage. — Active subperiosteal versus passive subdural 24-hour drainage following single burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (the SUPERDURA trial): protocol for a multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial
- The trial's primary clinical question uses a composite endpoint of 90-day mortality and symptomatic recurrence requiring reoperation. — Active subperiosteal versus passive subdural 24-hour drainage following single burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (the SUPERDURA trial): protocol for a multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial
- The trial includes all four Danish neurosurgical centres. — Active subperiosteal versus passive subdural 24-hour drainage following single burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (the SUPERDURA trial): protocol for a multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial