Surgical Randomised Controlled Trials

Cross-source consensus on Surgical Randomised Controlled Trials from 1 sources and 6 claims.

1 sources · 6 claims

Risks & contraindications

Background

Evidence quality

Highlighted claims

Randomised controlled trials are considered the reference standard for generating high-quality surgical evidence. — Patient and Public Involvement in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal SURGery: a protocol for the PPISurg systematic review
Surgical RCTs face recruitment, attrition, blinding, outcome selection, industry bias, and patient-relevance challenges. — Patient and Public Involvement in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal SURGery: a protocol for the PPISurg systematic review
PPI in surgical RCTs has been reported inconsistently and lacks a standardized implementation framework. — Patient and Public Involvement in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal SURGery: a protocol for the PPISurg systematic review
No previous systematic evaluation of PPI has focused specifically on general and abdominal surgery. — Patient and Public Involvement in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal SURGery: a protocol for the PPISurg systematic review
Earlier evidence found scarce PPI reporting in surgical trials and suboptimal reporting quality when PPI was described. — Patient and Public Involvement in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal SURGery: a protocol for the PPISurg systematic review
Some criticism of PPI concerns superficial compliance, tokenism, and feasibility. — Patient and Public Involvement in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal SURGery: a protocol for the PPISurg systematic review