Surveillance and Registries
Cross-source consensus on Surveillance and Registries from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Uses
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Other
Highlighted claims
- Surveillance is needed for planning, monitoring, resource allocation, and improving care quality. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
- FCVs had weaker surveillance infrastructure. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
- Limited national population-based registries constrain tracking of diabetes burden, outcomes, complications, and equity gaps over time. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
- Most countries had some diabetes-related data collection, but systems were often incomplete, uneven, or not nationally representative. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
- Eighteen countries collected national-level data on raised blood glucose. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
- Recommended surveillance improvements included regular population-based surveys, electronic health information systems, interoperability, and stronger diabetes registries. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region