Systematic Review Methods
Cross-source consensus on Systematic Review Methods from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Where it comes from
Other
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- Included studies had to contain a comparison arm, enroll laypeople, and target at least one IHC key concept. — Do studies of interventions to improve laypeople’s critical thinking about health choices assess potential harms? A systematic review
- Seven databases were searched up to March 2025. — Do studies of interventions to improve laypeople’s critical thinking about health choices assess potential harms? A systematic review
- Two reviewers independently extracted data at every stage, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. — Do studies of interventions to improve laypeople’s critical thinking about health choices assess potential harms? A systematic review
- The search strategy did not add adverse-effect or harm terms because that would likely reduce recall. — Do studies of interventions to improve laypeople’s critical thinking about health choices assess potential harms? A systematic review