Systematic Review Process

Uses

Evidence quality

Highlighted claims

• Quality assessment applies SIGN, Drummond, and Cochrane Handbook tools in parallel to each included study. — Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol
• Retrieved citations are imported into Rayyan for duplicate identification and removal. — Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol
• An article advances to full-text review only if at least two of three assigned screening authors agree on inclusion. — Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol
• Data extraction uses a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet structured according to the CHEERS checklist. — Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol
• One co-author and Elicit independently extract data, and a second co-author validates and compiles the results. — Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol
• All co-authors screen the same 10% of articles before full screening to calibrate agreement. — Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol
• Studies are classified as high, moderate, or low quality based on average scores across the three tools. — Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol
• Title and abstract screening uses author pairs plus a third co-author for conflict resolution. — Cost-effectiveness of infection prevention and control measures for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review protocol