Technical Success
Cross-source consensus on Technical Success from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Uses
How it works
Other
Highlighted claims
- The primary outcome is technical success of FANS navigation into the lower pole renal calyx. — Steerable versus Conventional flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Pole stones Treatment: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised superiority trial (SCULPT trial)
- Basket use to reposition the stone or compensate for failed access is counted as primary endpoint failure. — Steerable versus Conventional flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Pole stones Treatment: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised superiority trial (SCULPT trial)
- Technical success requires sheath-tip access to the lower pole calyx with ureteroscope deflection, stone visualisation, laser lithotripsy, and fragment aspiration without adjunctive tools. — Steerable versus Conventional flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Pole stones Treatment: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised superiority trial (SCULPT trial)
- The primary endpoint tests the proposed advantage of active controlled deflection and stable lower calyx access in steerable FANS. — Steerable versus Conventional flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Pole stones Treatment: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised superiority trial (SCULPT trial)