Test-Retest Reliability

Cross-source consensus on Test-Retest Reliability from 1 sources and 4 claims.

1 sources · 4 claims

Risks & contraindications

The male subgroup of only 12 participants was too small for reliable validation, leaving cIPAQ-SF measurement properties in overweight or obese men unknown. — Criterion validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form against activPAL in overweight and obese adults: a cross-sectional study
Test-retest reliability was moderate for weekday sitting (ICC = 0.549) and weekend sitting (ICC = 0.614), and poor to moderate for MPA, VPA, and MVPA. — Criterion validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form against activPAL in overweight and obese adults: a cross-sectional study
Despite modest ICC values, categorical PA agreement was reasonably high at 84% for MPA, 82% for MVPA, and 76% for VPA. — Criterion validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form against activPAL in overweight and obese adults: a cross-sectional study
A notable pattern emerged where participants reported lower MPA, VPA, and MVPA on the second administration, potentially due to device-related self-consciousness. — Criterion validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form against activPAL in overweight and obese adults: a cross-sectional study