Transferability
Cross-source consensus on Transferability from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Findings may not fully generalise to low-income and middle-income countries or to different healthcare structures and cultures. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
- The review’s use of patient-reported qualitative data is a strength because it can reveal experiences missed by quantitative studies using predefined questions or interval measures. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
- Variation in sarcoma type, tumour location, age and sex allowed shared experiences to be identified but limited subtype-specific conclusions. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
- Because the synthesis used published analyses instead of raw data, contextual detail and nuance may have been lost. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
- Retrospective accounts may be affected by elapsed time and the context of data collection. — Patients’ experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis