Travel Burden
Cross-source consensus on Travel Burden from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- Travel burden was measured as average road-network travel time from local resident areas to nearby family physicians. — Going the distance: a cross-sectional geospatial analysis quantifying province-wide inequities in travel-based access, and fragility of access to French-language primary care provided by family physicians in Ontario, Canada
- The travel-time analysis did not include traffic, weather, or time-of-day conditions. — Going the distance: a cross-sectional geospatial analysis quantifying province-wide inequities in travel-based access, and fragility of access to French-language primary care provided by family physicians in Ontario, Canada
- Across Ontario, Francophones had larger travel burdens to reach the nearest five language-concordant family physicians than the general population had to reach any nearby family physicians. — Going the distance: a cross-sectional geospatial analysis quantifying province-wide inequities in travel-based access, and fragility of access to French-language primary care provided by family physicians in Ontario, Canada
- The study used Valhalla to calculate travel times along public roads while respecting road networks, traffic laws, and speed limits. — Going the distance: a cross-sectional geospatial analysis quantifying province-wide inequities in travel-based access, and fragility of access to French-language primary care provided by family physicians in Ontario, Canada
- The median difference between French-language and English-language travel burden was 13.4 minutes. — Going the distance: a cross-sectional geospatial analysis quantifying province-wide inequities in travel-based access, and fragility of access to French-language primary care provided by family physicians in Ontario, Canada