TRC Implementation
Cross-source consensus on TRC Implementation from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Comparisons
Background
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- The TRC model expanded from five California sites before 2017 to 53 operating sites across the United States. — Barriers and enablers to scaling implementation of Trauma Recovery Center model of care: a protocol for scoping review
- Eligible studies must examine implementation barriers or facilitators tied to at least one core TRC element within a coordinated multidisciplinary model. — Barriers and enablers to scaling implementation of Trauma Recovery Center model of care: a protocol for scoping review
- The expansion creates a need for evidence about factors that support or obstruct implementation. — Barriers and enablers to scaling implementation of Trauma Recovery Center model of care: a protocol for scoping review
- The planned review focuses on implementation and scale-up rather than only programme outcomes. — Barriers and enablers to scaling implementation of Trauma Recovery Center model of care: a protocol for scoping review
- Studies of a single TRC element qualify only if the element is studied within a coordinated multidisciplinary TRC-consistent model. — Barriers and enablers to scaling implementation of Trauma Recovery Center model of care: a protocol for scoping review