Treatment Costs
Cross-source consensus on Treatment Costs from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Comparisons
Other
Highlighted claims
- Mean treatment cost was substantially lower for LNG-IUS than for HNR. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
- LNG-IUS cost ￥2273.8 RMB per woman on average compared with ￥6318.0 RMB for HNR. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
- The mean cost difference favored LNG-IUS by ￥4044.2 RMB. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
- Higher HNR costs were mainly due to preoperative examinations and anaesthesia fees. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
- LNG-IUS costs were primarily driven by the device price and did not include anaesthesia or hospitalisation expenses. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial