Trial Acceptability
Cross-source consensus on Trial Acceptability from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- The CTI model was acceptable to staff and service users. — Critical time intervention for people leaving prison at risk of homelessness in England and Wales (PHaCT trial): a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial
- Randomisation was unacceptable to some delivery staff because they saw it as ethically problematic in a vulnerable population with scarce support. — Critical time intervention for people leaving prison at risk of homelessness in England and Wales (PHaCT trial): a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial
- Future research should explore alternative designs such as quasi-experimental approaches to address concerns about randomisation and equipoise. — Critical time intervention for people leaving prison at risk of homelessness in England and Wales (PHaCT trial): a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial
- Process acceptability received an amber rating because the intervention was accepted but trial methods were contested. — Critical time intervention for people leaving prison at risk of homelessness in England and Wales (PHaCT trial): a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial