Trial and Error
Cross-source consensus on Trial and Error from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Uses
How it works
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Trial and error is necessary because clinicians and coaches cannot know ahead of time whether a specific intervention will work for an individual. — Trial, Error, and Restoring Motion
- Evidence-based or previously successful interventions still require testing against the current person's response. — Trial, Error, and Restoring Motion
- Experimentation should remain within low-risk boundaries. — Trial, Error, and Restoring Motion
- A failed cue can be useful because it tells the coach to change the input. — Trial, Error, and Restoring Motion
- Clinical decision-making should prioritize outcomes over adherence to a familiar or conventional method. — Trial, Error, and Restoring Motion
- Fear of failure can interfere with experimentation in clinical work. — Trial, Error, and Restoring Motion