United States Comparison
Cross-source consensus on United States Comparison from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Comparisons
Background
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- The OECD database lacked comprehensive US procedural data for direct inclusion. — Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality from acute myocardial infarction in EU15+ countries, 2006–2020: a secondary analysis of the OECD database
- External US studies reported a PCI rate decline from 2006 to 2016. — Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality from acute myocardial infarction in EU15+ countries, 2006–2020: a secondary analysis of the OECD database
- The US PCI-to-CABG ratio decreased while most EU15+ countries moved in the opposite direction over the same interval. — Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality from acute myocardial infarction in EU15+ countries, 2006–2020: a secondary analysis of the OECD database
- Direct comparison between US and OECD datasets is limited by differences in collection and methodology. — Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality from acute myocardial infarction in EU15+ countries, 2006–2020: a secondary analysis of the OECD database
- Recent US data show PCI volumes increasing again. — Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality from acute myocardial infarction in EU15+ countries, 2006–2020: a secondary analysis of the OECD database