Universal Trial Design
Cross-source consensus on Universal Trial Design from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
How it works
Preparation
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Thirty-eight documents emphasized embedding universal design principles across all clinical trial stages. — Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review
- Eligibility criteria must be defined using standardized, valid assessments and must not exclude participants by default due to disability status. — Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review
- Co-design and collaboration with people with disabilities during protocol development was consistently recommended across included sources. — Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review
- Disability-inclusive trial design requires proactive budgeting with dedicated line items for accommodations, including interpreting services, extended assessment time, and longer study visits. — Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review
- Anti-ableist and equity-focused frameworks were highlighted by eleven sources as tools for reducing systemic exclusion in trial design. — Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review