VITALITY Study I

Cross-source consensus on VITALITY Study I from 1 sources and 4 claims.

1 sources · 4 claims

Comparisons

VITALITY Study II expands on Study I by tracking all 847 affected systematic reviews and all 1,330 retracted trials. — Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol
VITALITY Study I showed that retracted trials substantially distorted evidence syntheses. — Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol
In VITALITY Study I, nearly 10% of meta-analyses changed pooled-effect direction after retracted trials were removed. — Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol
VITALITY Study I tracked 68 substantially distorted systematic reviews to identify possible guidelines using that evidence. — Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol